Mortgage Broker

Fall 2016

Mortgage Broker is the magazine of the Canadian Mortgage Brokers Association and showcases the multi-billion dollar mortgage-broking industry to all levels of government, associated organizations and other interested individuals.

Issue link: http://digital.canadawide.com/i/753726

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 55 of 63

56 | fall 2016 cmba-achc.ca CMB MAGAZINE Canadian Press Images F ollowing a recent ruling by the Ontario Court of Appeal, the embattled Donald Trump must face Toronto investors in court over alleged misrepresentations involving his 65-storey hotel in the city's bustling downtown business district. e decision overturns a lower-court decision that sided with Trump and other defendants. Investors claim they were misled into purchasing units in the Trump International Hotel & Tower that were part of the hotel's rental pool, and so were to be rented out at luxury hotel rates. According to the investors, the sales tactics used by the developer grossly overstated expected hotel occupancy rates, which have not panned out. e investors are now looking to rescind their sales agreements, as well as claim for damages, deposit, loss of opportunity and other relief. While the court tossed claims for misrepresentation and breaches-of-securities rulings, Trump and others must still answer to claims of "oppression, collusion, [and] breach of fiduciary duties." – Samantha Gale Beating the bank A couple in the Cape Breton town of New Waterford have won an unprecedented judgment against their bank. e couple borrowed $18,000 in 2003 to purchase property, and had paid the principal down to $10,000 before falling on hard times and going into default on the mortgage. e bank proceeded to foreclose on the land and claim a balance owing by the couple on the mortgage covenant. e couple attempted to pay the bank the balance owing on the mortgage (just over $10,000), but this was rejected by the bank. Instead, the bank claimed a deficiency from the couple of almost $17,000, as the bank had acquired the property at a foreclosure auction for only $1,150 and then sold it to a realtor for just $4,000. In the end, the court found the bank had sought an unwarranted and extremely expensive remedy against the couple and reduced the amount owing to only $6,877. Justice Gerald Moir said in his ruling, "ere is no evidence that any thought was given by the bank to the efficacy or the efficiency of using foreclosures and sale to enforce a small loan against a vacant lot in a very depressed community." – Samantha Gale Trumped-Up Case A Donald Trump and others must still answer to claims of "oppression, collusion, [and] breach of fiduciary duties"

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Mortgage Broker - Fall 2016