Mortgage Broker

Summer 2016

Mortgage Broker is the magazine of the Canadian Mortgage Brokers Association and showcases the multi-billion dollar mortgage-broking industry to all levels of government, associated organizations and other interested individuals.

Issue link: http://digital.canadawide.com/i/708399

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 47

20 | summer 2016 cmba-achc.ca CMB MAGAZINE Background e British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) has overruled much of the British Columbia Supreme Court's (BCSC) decision that had allowed a class action lawsuit concerning CIBC's mortgage prepayment clauses to go ahead. (See the Summer 2014 edition of Mortgage Broker for more details.) e BCCA decision is very important as to the payments a lender may require from a borrower who pays out a closed mortgage prior to the mortgage due date. A class action lawsuit allows a person to bring a lawsuit on behalf of himself or herself as well as a class of people who face the same issue. Among other benefits of and reasons for a class action lawsuit, it allows issues to be raised for people who, individually, would not find it economical to go to court and for court resources to be used more efficiently. To better balance the competing interests of parties to the lawsuit (including as between the claimants, some of whom are not known at the time the lawsuit is ongoing), a class action lawsuit can proceed only with permission from the court. In the CIBC case, the borrower seeks to bring the case forward as a class action lawsuit. She seeks to be the litigation representative for persons in B.C. who borrowed money from CIBC and prepaid part or all of the principal amounts secured by those mortgages from 2005 onward. e amounts charged to individuals in the class range from less than $1,000 to tens of thousands of dollars. e borrower wanted the court to order that CIBC pay back to borrowers improperly collected prepayment penalties. e borrower claimed the collection was improper because: n the prepayment clause was void due to it giving discretion to CIBC in the method with which it calculated the prepayment penalty, n CIBC had systemically miscalculated prepayment penalties, or n CIBC had acted unconscionably in collecting the prepayment penalties. As well, the borrower wanted the court to order that CIBC pay punitive damages. Lenders can have considerable discretion to determine prepayment penalties BY RAY BASI, LL.B STAFF, EDUCATION AND POLICY REVIEW PIPER PAYING THE

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Mortgage Broker - Summer 2016