Mortgage Broker

Spring 2016

Mortgage Broker is the magazine of the Canadian Mortgage Brokers Association and showcases the multi-billion dollar mortgage-broking industry to all levels of government, associated organizations and other interested individuals.

Issue link: http://digital.canadawide.com/i/675954

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 8 of 47

CMB MAGAZINE cmba-achc.ca spring 2016 | 9 budgetanalysis rate and shorter term. n Subject only to a few exemptions, borrow- ers need a credit score of 600 or more. n e maximum amortization period was reduced from 30 years to 25 years. * e total debt service ratio must be 44 per cent or less than income. n e maximum amount that borrowers can refinance was reduced from 85 per cent to 80 per cent of the property value. n Rental income rules have tightened up so that a maximum of 50 per cent of the gross rental income can be added back to income for high-ratio insured rentals. n Non-amortizing home equity lines of credit can no longer be insured. n Buyers of homes which cost over $1 million must have a minimum of 20 per cent down payment. e 2016 Budget refers to some of these measures and, while not implementing anything new, states that vulnerabilities related to housing and consumer debt will continue to be monitored closely and the government will implement further measures as needed. Morneau then clearly endorses the traditional measures adopted from the previous Conservative government. Canadians in certain city centres, namely Vancouver and Toronto, are now facing sky- rocketing housing prices, which are no longer in sync with average incomes. Some prospective homeowners are diligently saving their necessary down-payment funds, only to discover that they cannot keep up with the rising market. By the time they have saved what they thought was a sufficient amount, the market price may have increased by even more than the amount of their hard-earned down payment. Do down-payment restrictions always make sense in a low interest rate environment and a rising market? Does it make sense to stick with 25-year amortizations, when longer amortizations can give homeowners some financial breathing room and enable them to afford a better quality of life? Would concerns about a housing collapse and rising interest rates be alleviated if we provide longer amortizations, such as 30 years, but still qualify borrowers based on shorter amortizations, such as 25 years? House prices in big cities may continue to rise or trail off and stabilize, but one certainty is that housing affordability challenges are likely here to stay. Yet we find no fresh solutions from the government to enable average Canadians to better afford home ownership. e new government, which has clearly taken advantage of our low interest rate environment and demonstrated an ability to take bold and decisive changes of course, could have opted for a similar approach when tackling the issue of housing affordability.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Mortgage Broker - Spring 2016